SCIREA Journal of Philosophy (ISSN: 2995-7788)

SCIREA Journal of Philosophy is an international, scientific peer-reviewed open access journal published online by SCIREA.

Open Access free for readers, with article processing charges (APC)paid by authors or their institutions.

High visibility: Indexed in the Google Scholar and other databases.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision provided to authors approximately 20 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 5 days.

Recognition of reviewers: reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any SCIREA journal, in appreciation of the work done.

Recently Published Papers
Open Access
Qing Cao, Hui Li
Abstract: This paper firstly proves that the syllogism EMO-4 is valid, and secondly indicates the validity of the other 14 syllogisms can be deduced from that of EMO-4 with the help of generalized quantifier theory, set theory, and first-order logic. And more valid generalized syllogisms can be deduced when one continues to infer. It
Abstract       References PDF (229376 k) 19 Downloads     736 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720092
Open Access
Feifei Yang, Xiaojun Zhang
Abstract: This paper firstly provides knowledge representations of Aristotelian modal syllogisms from the perspective of mathematical structuralism, and proves the validity of Aristotelian modal syllogism E⼞I◇O-4, and then by making full use of relevant definitions, facts, and some inference rules, formally derive other 30 valid moda
Abstract       References PDF (297251 k) 23 Downloads     2740 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720089
Open Access
Siyi Yu, Xiaojun Zhang
Abstract: Due to the large number of generalized quantifiers in the English language, this paper only studies the fragment of generalized modal syllogistic that contains the quantifiers in Square{all} and Square{most}. On the basis of generalized quantifier theory, possible-world semantics, and set theory, this paper shows that there
Abstract       References PDF (443392 k) 20 Downloads     28634 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720087
Open Access
Qing Cao, Long Wei
Abstract: This paper firstly presents knowledge representations of Aristotelian modal syllogisms based on the structure of modal categorical propositions; Then, the validity of syllogism ⼞AA◇A-1 was proved by using the truth value definitions of these propositions. And then this syllogism was used for knowledge reasoning with the hel
Abstract       References PDF (340965 k) 20 Downloads     27238 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720086
Open Access
Yijiang Hao
Abstract: With the help of the definitions of the inner and outer negative Aristotelian quantifiers, the symmetry of Aristotelian quantifiers no and some, the anti-syllogism rules and the subsequent weakening rule, this paper illustrates the reducible relations between valid Aristotelian syllogisms of different figures and different
Abstract       References PDF (301631 k) 56 Downloads     54755 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720083
Open Access
Jing Xu, Xiaojun Zhang
Abstract: There is the reducibility between the generalized modal syllogism ☐AM◊I-1 and the other 20 valid generalized modal syllogisms. This paper first proves the validity of the generalized modal syllogism based on the truth value definitions of sentences with quantification, set theory and modal logic, then derives the other 20 v
Abstract       References PDF (360592 k) 78 Downloads     50280 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy720075
Open Access
Jon K. Amundson
Abstract: Though grief and loss have been normalized in mental health discourse, a particular class ofbereavement remains as diagnosis- Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder. Discussion of thismore complex and enduring condition is undertaken in what follows. The dynamics of grief andloss are discussed through this diagnostic categ
Abstract       References PDF (29267 k) 85 Downloads     50453 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72071
Open Access
Givishvili G.
Abstract: Empirical data in situ of recent years indicate that spacetime does not exist physically: they are not material - they do not have any of the characteristics inherent in material objects. At the same time, space-time is the most fundamental and universal mediator between all, without exception, material objects of Nature. I
Abstract       References PDF (676864 k) 83 Downloads     50417 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72069
Open Access
Givi Givishvili
Abstract: Three space experiments carried out in 2004-2018 placed all points on "i" in the discussion about the nature of space-time, which began with the apories of Zeno of Eleia. Experiments have proved that space-time does not exist physically. They are what Democritus called "nothing," unlike "what," which is associated with ever
Abstract       References PDF (182272 k) 80 Downloads     50647 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72066
Open Access
Valeri F. VENDA, Sergei S. Kostenko
Abstract: V. Venda discovered four laws of mutual adaptation and transformations (Voprosy Phylosofii, #2, 2017). Previously the laws were tested and practically used in development of new, the transformation learning theory, in prediction of social and economic transitions, in studies of human-computer interaction, design of safe wor
Abstract       References PDF (135713 k) 69 Downloads     50894 Views     DOI: 10.54647/philosophy72059